…but from dirty tactics to quash the voices of those who oppose the destruction of the environment.
…because they can’t win on virtue– they have none. And if you have no good facts to support your argument, you go after the person– ad hominem.
Speaking of which, I was listening to NPR (National Polite Republican) this morning, and they had a Keystone apologist. He was a young one (that’s what they do–get the young and stupid to do their bidding for them), whom didn’t know his arse from a hole in the ground. He was just spewing Big OIl’s talking points.
He admitted that the jobs that would be created would be temporary construction jobs. He outright lied about TransCanada picking up the bill if there was an oil spill. They specifically had it written in the contract NOT to be responsible if there was a spill.
…because TransCanada knows that this toxic sludge is a monster to clean up, a la Kalamazoo, which they are still cleaning up three years after the spill. It cuts into their billions of profits, see? They just can’t have that. Responsibility is not in Big Oil’s vocabulary.
And anyone who promises to “clean up” and make things right should be regarded as a flat-out liar. As the folks along the Kalamazoo can attest to.
From the Enbridge spokesperson:
He says Enbridge wants to complete all of the restoration work along Line 6B by sometime in 2015.
~~~~~~~~~
So…five years after the fact…they will have “cleaned up” a spill And it still will never be the same. Never. No matter what they do, the toxic chemicals will destroy plants, wildlife;, pollute water, air, and land; and change that ecosystem for the worse. Because everything in nature relies on another part of nature. When the plankton die, the fish starve. When the fish die, the birds starve. Or if they survive, their biological systems are forever altered by the toxins–reproductive and altered natural progress.
From the article (Part 3):
“In other words, Enbridge was judge and jury as to whether you had a legitimate claim or not. As opposed to having a neutral third party that didn’t have conflict of interest making those decisions.”
[Attorney Bill] Mayhall says Enbridge was quick to compensate for property damage… but has resisted paying damages for health related claims. An Enbridge spokesman insists the company has settled some claims related to health complaints.
~~~~~~~
And herein lies the worst of it–Big Oil does not, under any circumstances, want to admit how its product causes health issues. If they did this, the flood gates would open to how petroleum truly impacts the health of people–much more so than is acknowledged. Think of the folks living near the Kochs’ plants–severe breathing problems and people dropping like flies from cancer.
And the idea that people can just “move away” if there is a toxic spill is incredibly shortsighted, as this quote will attest:
Wayne Groth is standing on the deck overlooking the backyard of his new home south of Battle Creek. He and his wife Sue moved late in the spring.
It’s a lovely home, with only one possible problem.
“We’ve got another little creek running by our house and we discovered after we bought this place there’s another pipeline real close by. I thought that was a little ironic.”
~~~~~~~~~~
You can’t poison the Earth in one spot, move to another and somehow magically you’re not ever, ever, ever going to be subjected to toxins again.
End of fairytale. Good night.
You must be logged in to post a comment.