The NY Times has a rebuttal by Woody Allen on the child molestation allegations. Since I posted Dylan Farrow’s letter, I feel it only fair to give the same to Allen.
The piece not only doesn’t change my mind, but reaffirms my belief that he most likely did molest Dylan Farrow. Allen attacks Mia with the tired “scorned woman” defense with “evidence” that is questionable. Mia acted as any mother would act if she found the father in a sexual relationship with the daughter (Soon-Yi) . What kind of deviant takes nude pictures of his girlfriend’s daughter?
He stated that he “passed” the lie detector test, but fails to state that his own lawyer had a friend do the test–it was not administered by police. And they are notorious for giving false results.
A commenter provided a link to the court documents of their custody battle. It’s pretty damning. Woody Allen had been giving sole attention to Dylan, while ignoring the other children. Others noted inappropriate actions towards Dylan BEFORE the affair with Soon-Yi, Mia’s adopted daughter, most notably the event in the TV room.
Even before the Soon-Yi affair, Allen was not giving Dylan appropriate physical space–he was not honoring boundaries–a red flag. The judge stated that Allen’s behavior with Dylan was inappropriate.
The conclusion stated that Allen had not demonstrated any parenting skills that would allow him to have custody of any of the children. He did not consider the consequences of his actions with Soon-Yi. He was oblivious to it.
Additionally, Allen had an affair with a girl of 17 years of age while he was 42—a twenty-five year difference….so there is history there of him with much, much younger women who are more vulnerable to manipulation and/or abuse. I’m not saying that age difference is a sole factor–if a 40 year old woman is seeing a 65 year old man, that is hugely different than a young woman of 17. Choosing vulnerable women of that age speaks volumes.
You must be logged in to post a comment.