I think I posted this before, but bears repeating--the drone map.
California Sheriff faces protests on drones.
I think I posted this before, but bears repeating--the drone map.
California Sheriff faces protests on drones.
Rachel Maddow has a special out on the selling of the Iraq War. Unfortunately, I’m at a computer with no sound today, so I can’t listen to this piece. I hope that she holds Hillary Rodham Clinton accountable, and the other dems who were all too happy to go along with the charade.
Searching on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s vote for Iraq war, continuing to perpetuate the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie (and she says it with a smile on her face…can’t wait to launch the attacks…)
There may be other reasons for that smile– here and others who had investments in defense contractors here.
commondreams has this up on the *cough* reporting of the Iraq war…or I should say, the blind acceptance of the “facts” without a hint of healthy cynicism and questioning authority that the serious situation required.
FAIR’s worst moments in journalism.
Last night on CBS, they had a story of an Afghan youth who could not play a musical instrument because the Taliban had outlawed any music that was not religious. It’s great that he is part of a musical troupe but in no way does it justify us going to war. I’m sorry that probably sounds cold, but I have to think —how many innocent people have died so this kid could play a musical instrument? Why does America have to spend billions of dollars policing another country? Of course, there was no mention of the oil in Afghanistan…
Continuing along the thoughts on Friday’s blog~~~
I don’t mind telling you that this blog brought tears to my eyes. Really stunning to read such honesty and depth. And he’s not gay! (meaning that, as Patrick states, most gay guys “get” women and their perspective, but straight guys, especially straight white guys don’t.)
From the interview:
Growing up in my house, feminism was actually a positive word. My mother, who is a strong woman, has always identified as a feminist. Despite this fact, she found herself being mistreated by my father. This just goes to show that even strong women — even feminist-identified women — can find themselves involved with men who treat them badly.
~~~~~~~~~
This was so powerful…because in the finger-pointing department, when blame is being handed out, it’s always the woman’s fault if she is mistreated.
This, too, was powerful:
Seeing the way she was treated, and experiencing mistreatment myself, showed me that boys who grow up in violent households do not have to follow the path of the abuser. Instead, we can follow another path — the path of empathy for our mother, and that we can become allies in the struggle for women’s equality, rather than just another violent enforcer of male supremacy.
~~~~~
This is the thing that is so hard to understand: why do some men recognize what was done to them and their mothers, but then go on to abuse others? Why do some choose that path and others fight against it?
And this reinforces my thoughts on a previous blog on how some folks are abused but do not go on to continue the abuse. I’m thinking there are more out there than is being acknowledged, because they aren’t the ones being arrested for committing acts of cruelty…they are the ones quietly living their lives without repeating the abuse…
…but that also doesn’t mean that all of those committing acts of cruelty are being dealt with by society…such as men who beat their mates, but the mates refuse to press charges (or never call police to report it.)
Further down the post, Patrick goes into what defines feminism–and how women themselves cannot agree on the definition. I know that I don’t. As I’ve posted before, I believe in equality, but I don’t think abortions should be performed after six weeks’ gestation. But feminists don’t see it that way–they feel a woman should be able to have an abortion any time she wants it–right up until birth. I can’t in good conscience agree with that thinking. In the feminist world, that automatically excludes me from being called a feminist. This point of view wasn’t easy to come by, either, as I have seen the photo of the woman dead on a hotel room floor with a hangar protruding from her vagina. I don’t want to see women in such desperate circumstances that they resort to that–it is much better to have safe, reliable contraceptives available to her. (Yes, men should be responsible for contraception, too, but since she is the one who will be most impacted by a pregnancy, and he could be unreliable, she needs to take responsibility for her own sake.)
Feminists in the 70s were so anti-homemaking that women who chose this route were treated as if they were mindless dummies.
It’s an odd circumstance that things that defined us as women–the home, childbirth and raising children, became so hated. It’s as if they wanted us to become equal by embracing the stereotyped attributes of men.
In other words, we could only be thought of as valuable and therefore equal….if we became men…
…and the unintended consequences of that is the world tilted even more towards the masculine and diminished the feminine.
What we need to right the world is to once again embrace the feminine as valuable–to recognize that one can be soft as well as strong and that those two attributes don’t have to be mutually exclusive. That we can prop each other up when one is feeling weak, instead of attacking. That it’s okay for women to have an opinion different than a man’s and it’s just as valid and valuable. That taking care of the Earth is the feminine that needs to be honored.
There’s more to write, but perhaps for another day. I’m out of time.
PR Watch.org has this up on the gerrymandering in Wisconsin.
From the article:
In early February of 2012, GOP legislators released multiple documents, but continued to keep around 84 emails confidential. The three judges — two of them appointed by Republican presidents — again criticized the Republican legislators for “an all but shameful attempt” to keep documents secret, writing: “Without a doubt, the Legislature made a conscious choice to involve private lawyers in what gives every appearance of an attempt — albeit poorly disguised — to cloak the private machinations of Wisconsin’s Republican legislators in the shroud of attorney-client privilege.”
And…incredibly:
According to the documents that were released, Republican legislators signed a pledge of secrecy during the redistricting process and were told to ignore what GOP leaders said publicly about the new election maps.
~~~~~~~~
What is this, high school or college where you make secret pledges? Seriously?? Does this mean they get double secret probation?
Note that some emails obtained by Center for Media and Democracy were not released to the lawyers challenging the maps. Just incredible!
I think this is why Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the tea partiers are so baffled that they lost the election….how could they lose when they’ve worked so hard against the democratic process??
~~~~~~~
More on ALEC sponsors here.
~~~~~~~
And, lastly, ALEC and the electoral college here. They just can’t figure out enough ways to demolish the democratic process….
…is slowly being eroded, we know, but then there are among us the rebels who won’t go quietly.
Oh, the imagination is running into overdrive with all the fun I could have of this…but I want to keep this blog, um, family friendly. haha.
From Cornell Law:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
~~~~~
I have a Paralegal Certificate and my professor told me that this means that if a police officer pulls you over, you have the right to refuse to give your name or any information unless you are put under arrest. And with my experience with this, you don’t even have to be in suspicion of a crime–you just have to be in the area–doing your job–to be treated like you were a criminal.
You know, there is a Canadian program on my public radio station here in FW that airs a part of a segment where a guy has said he had awards for “favorite food, TV program,” etc., and one of the categories is “best performance of impersonating a politician” (or something to that effect) “won by Dan Quayle three years in a row until Dick Cheney came along…”
I think there should just be a category for “best performance by a politician while trying to appear genuine”.
I think Hillary Clinton would win in a landslide….
No, I’m not going to link to any of the political sites that are praising her “performance” today. It really sickens me how they have annointed her Saint Hillary that can do no wrong and refuse to look at her and Bill’s records with any degree of unemotional critical assessment. They would be livid at that same stuff if it were done by a repub.
The fake break in her voice was the top of the performance. Not a tear in the eyes. Her eyes were not even red. My voice doesn’t usually break until the tears begin to fall and the emotions have bubbled to the top.
The anger at the question of what exactly happened? “It doesn’t matter!!” Really?
She didn’t read the memo. Didn’t read the memo….
I recalled that during the Clintons term in office, I always felt manipulated. It didn’t happen overnight, but eventually, it came to be a frequent feeling whenever a crisis would occur and once again they escaped accountability.
Susie Madrak has a post up on MLK’s birthday celebration. This is my view, too, on how everybody brings up “I Have a Dream” speech, and then fail to acknowledge his “Beyond Vietnam” speech (which he gave a year to the day before his murder).
He was expanding from the Civil Rights protests towards protesting the condition of the poor and of the terrible consequences of war. This was more of a threat to the status quo than anything he had done prior. Indeed, even his friends that had supported him during the Civil Rights era were abandoning him when he started advocating for the poor and protesting against war. According to those that knew him, he never felt so alone.
He knew that advocating those positions was dangerous.
And he did it anyway….
I wanted to explore the health factors that indicate heavy metal poisoning and the African Americans.
I found this link on BET. Diabetes can be caused by heavy metal poisoning, and high blood pressure is linked to the adrenals and kidneys which can be severely affected by heavy metal toxicity, therefore, affecting blood pressure. And, of course, heavy metal poisoning is closely associated with autistic symptoms. I say “symptoms” because I’m not sure that the poisoning causes autism, but it most definitely causes autistic symptoms, as has been my experience.
Here’s another site. I’ve come across a couple of websites geared towards the African American link to autism, but they are exploring the issue of comparison between whites and blacks being diagnosed later. I’m trying to get away from that because it’s not helpful. It is not going towards the issue itself of autism and the possible causes behind it. It’s upsetting to me because the blanket statement that whites get diagnosed sooner than blacks is not my experience, nor others who also diagnosed themselves. I, a white person, was not diagnosed by any damn doctor, after years of low thyroid, adrenal issues, chronic fatigue, migraines, and the symptoms of autism of wanting to be left alone, wanting to stay in my house and never leave it, diminishing communication skills, memory loss, hyperfocusing, exaggerated startle response, etc.
When I searched for a link with African Americans and heavy metal poisoning, I again came up empty.
I searched “chronic fatigue and African Americans and found this. As I read the paragraph:
Psychosocial variables may influence the experience of chronic fatigue, especially in individuals of color. Overarching psychosocial realities such as the endemic nature of ethnic/racial discrimination and the complexity of the acculturation process may bear on the experience of fatigue. This study evaluated whether the acculturation process was related to chronic fatigue and racism among African Americans and Latinos. While associations among the predicted variables were not statistically significant, distinct divisions among levels of acculturation appeared between African Americans and Latinos. Membership in a community of color likely increases the complexity of the experience of chronic fatigue in a manner that requires further investigation.
~~~~~~~~
Okay, what I’m reading from this is that the psychobabble is stating that chronic fatigue is a psychological problem. Pfft. Yep, they’ve been telling women that for decades…didn’t even acknowledge that it was a true physical condition until very recently. These women were just lazy and hypochrondriacs who needed to get a life, when in reality they were the first to suffer the effects of low thyroid and adrenal fatigue from a toxic environment.
Reading this website, the symptom onset after a traumatic event, either physical or emotional, with the compromised immune system is a red flag for an inflamed gut from Celiac or gluten intolerance. It’s the final straw that breaks the body. I have issues with the link to the psychological, although stress does affect the immune system, I don’t think it’s the cause of it. It’s too convenient to blame psychological stress than to explore things such as heavy metal toxicity and/or leaky gut. It’s been proven that gluten intolerance can cause psychological symptoms, and this has been known since before WWII. Therefore, the psychological stuff comes *after* the leaky gut or whatever physical issue is beleaguering the body, not necessarily the other way around.
As a side note, I found this link. I had forgotten about the Gulf War syndrome being the first serious acknowledgement that chronic fatigue was an actual physical ailment and not psychological. And the link between Gulf War syndrome and vaccines should not be ignored.
From the website:
“Despite these agreements between FDA and DoD, and DoD’s official subsequent decision to administer the vaccine voluntarily, many PGW veterans claim that they were not told what vaccine they were being given, or what the risks were, either orally or in writing. Many report that they were told not to tell medical personnel that they had received a vaccination, even if the vaccination caused pain or swelling. No record of the vaccine was available in medical records; as a result, physicians who were concerned about any local or systemic reactions were uninformed about the possible causes. Veterans who claim they were harmed by the vaccine or pyridostigmine frequently have no proof that they were vaccinated or took the pills, or that they had an adverse reaction. Moreover, virtually none of the soldiers received more than two of the botulism vaccinations, even though DoD informed FDA they would administer the three shots necessary for protection…
~~~~~~~~~~~
So, folks…you should run right out and get that flu vaccine. Run! NOW!
You must be logged in to post a comment.