Susan Rice was on the tube today trying to sell the war. She tried playing on people’s emotions by saying that she was thinking of her own children as she watched the tapes of the children being gassed.
What about the children in Iraq? Don’t they remind Susan Rice of her children, too? More here.
How many children will be lost if we bomb Syria?
I asked the question “don’t we know how to use diplomacy anymore?” And it appears that John Kerry was an accidental diplomat when he reportedly made an offhanded remark that Syria could turn over chemical weapons to the international community. Now the State Dept. says it was “rhetorical”.
Are you serious?
Kerry apparently wasn’t, but Russia was and is now going to make moves to get Syria to hand over the chemicals. Well, now…didn’t expect that.
Who would have thought that Russia would have more diplomatic skills than the United States State Department?!
Damn….guess Wall St and the Congress warmongers aren’t going to be able to profit off another war. (she says with fingers and toes crossed and saying a prayer…)
An update to this post….apparently, the Rabbi made a snide remark about Weiner being “married to an Arab” . Yeah, that kind of nixes one’s self-righteous position, doesn’t it? **edited to add: it was Jon Stewart that brought that to light. Sorry, I was tired when I posted last night.)
Doesn’t mean I’ve changed my mind about the rest of the exchange or Weiner’s campaign nor his actions towards women, though. But he has a right to be married to whomever he chooses without that being a factor in his fitness for mayor. He’s not fit for mayor for his predator actions and his thinking that exposing himself was a joke.
Wow. I am continually amazed at what has been going on behind the scenes with the charter school engineers. Truly amazing how they have been able to get away with it.
This report from a teacher who spells out exactly what my fear is of the nonsense testing that really cannot test potential and does not allow for the obstacles to learning for kids in poorer districts….and then blames the public school teacher for things that are out of their control: student engagement and parent involvement. The resident troll, teaching economist, has finally revealed he has no clue about what teachers in k-12 are up against. He teaches lecture courses of 500 students, some of them online. There is no engagement with classes that size–that was my complaint about my classes in college–no class discussion to enrich the learning experience. The guy’s a robot who cannot engage in dialogue.
Advice from a money manager….who actually likes public education.
From a comment:
As a teacher with wealthy connections, I can tell you that most of the rich don’t care much about public education either way. They send their kids to private school on principle. The public schools are for the “unwashed masses”. They use private schools to separate their children from the commoners. The old money saw public schools as giving back to their butler’s kids or their cook’s children, and they weren’t bothered by paying taxes (chump change anyway). The new money see taxes for public schools as irritating, and they want to keep as much money as they can, and don’t care about their cook’s children, city children, etc. The “new money” have no interest in community or helping others.
~~~~~~~~
Spot on. The wealthy do not care about public education. Period. It has always been for the “rest of us” who cannot or will not put our kids into private schools. The most annoying thing to the wealthy is that public education creates citizens who are….educated. Educated citizens cause all sorts of trouble–like being able to carry on arguments against the destruction of public schools; like asking intelligent questions of politicians; of fighting for civil rights….of fighting against things the wealthy hold dear: greed, selfishness, lack of social conscience…..
~~~~~~~~
The student who stood up to be heard at the *cough* conversation with teachers has a blog up explaining what went on. What a powerful young woman…this old lady was worried about the future generation, but Hannah gives me hope….
The EU has urged the U.S. to wait until the U.N. report comes back before it takes any action. Note how the French have made a stupid statement that the U.N. report is basically not needed. Yep. That tells me more than anything the U.N. is very important to the assessment of what is going on and who is doing it. I am increasingly suspicious that it isn’t Syria doing it….then the question is…who is…?
Two topics that might not seem interrelated popped up this morning–the mindless demands that children perform like cogs….and the privatization of Walter Reed. Note that the only ones who truly benefit from this are the profiteers. The children don’t reach their true potential and the most vulnerable–the sick and elderly–don’t get the care we are capable of giving them….
(hat tip Diane Ravitch for Robert Rendo’s comment)
Another angry voter has words with Anthony Weiner.
Notice that he doesn’t dismiss the Rabbi like he did this lady. He doesn’t tell him to “relax” and he doesn’t accuse him of trying to get attention like he did the angry woman who voted for him.
This drives home his view of women, imo. Angry women who call him on his bull are to be patronized and dismissed. Angry men are not.
….and you don’t see men on the sidelines encouraging Weiner to put the angry man in his place….
Anytime anyone involves ego in a decision, you can bet it is a bad decision. Going to war over a warped perception of credibility is wrong. And America’s credibility was seriously damaged with going to war in Iraq. We were perceived as bullies and liars. The whole world rejoiced when Barack Obama was elected because the whole world disagreed with our invasion.
But the world’s perception of us didn’t seem to bother Congress before now, eh?
And what exactly does “protect our values” mean?? Because I don’t value war.
Kerry tries to shut up opposing voices by throwing out ” this is not the time for armchair isolationists”….that’s you and me, folks, the American public that speaks out against war. We’re sick of war and we’re sick of millionaire politicians telling us that our opinions don’t matter.
He asks if one would be comfortable if we don’t act and Assad gasses his people. Hello? Are we alone in the world? Israel and Saudi Arabia have a stake in this and they should be expected to bear the brunt of it–skin in the game, as they say…they are both wealthy nations, and we are fast losing our wealth. Well, it’s still there, technically, but in the hands of a few who don’t want to pay taxes….that… fund… wars. So Saudi Arabia and Israel need to ante up.
Note how Kerry asserts that there will be no boots on the ground, but from what I was watching yesterday, he once again flip-flopped and stated that he did not want that put in writing because it may become necessary if things escalate. Mighty suspicious….
Tell me again why Kerry was trying to interfere with U.N. gathering evidence on chemical weapons? And why aren’t we waiting for the U.N. to get the results bacK? The Syria situation is not new–this has been happening for over a year now….so why the rush, rush, rush to bomb?
And tell me why those pictures of the dead keep nagging at me–like I have seen them before…? That they were from a chemical weapons attack, but not the current event with Syria?? I just can’t shake that feeling.
Here’s the view from emptywheel. During the hearing, Kerry was drumming his fingers on the table with impatience that they were questioning him. John McCain was caught playing computer games….on taxpayer’s dime. If those same taxpayers were caught playing computer games during company time, they would be fired.
Another take here on it from the Israelis:
Note the sentiment if the U.S. doesn’t strike, Israel will. Is that supposed to be a threat of some sort?
Lastly, John Kerry’s testimony as a Vietnam veteran before Congress, below. He stated yesterday that no chemicals had been used since WWI…I was stunned that he chose to ignore Agent Orange used in Vietnam. In this video, he acknowledges the horror of them and how we “destroyed villages in order to save them…” Note also the reference to Nixon, who stated he “did not want to be the first president to lose a war…” Doesn’t that sound eerily similar to “we have to go in to Syria to save our credibility…”?? The Communism threat was a lie, btw, as only 25% of the people in Vietnam were Communists. The rest were peaceful Buddhists. Pretty sad, eh?
**Edited to fix stupid link to Kerry’s Vietnam Testimony:
Eagle 
You must be logged in to post a comment.