Are you optimistic…

Chicago the band has posted this up.  Wow.

The pictures of New Orleans after Katrina really cause you to draw in a breath…how little things have changed, eh?

Limbaugh has been harping on how the Koch Conservatives are not racists, and how President Obama brought up how the Stafford Act was not enforced for the restoration effort after 9/11 in New York City nor for the other hurricane (the name escapes me at the moment) in Florida….but it was enforced for the victims of Katrina…

They state there was no racism involved in the non-effort of Bush.

My experience was different.

In my hometown (I should probably say the place I grew up in, because “home” has a warm, fuzzy feeling, and this was a cold, dark negative place) had a radio station that had changed ownership and was airing Limbaugh on the AM side.  When Katrina hit, they were asking for donations.  They specifically stated that the money would go to a certain county in Mississippi.  I asked someone with knowledge about demographics if this particular county voted Repub or Dem.  The answer:  Repub.

They were only going to send money to this county.  What a disgusting display of coldness towards human beings.

The First Amendment in action….

Yes, sir!

From Cornell University’s website here.

First Amendment

First amendment: an overview

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the “separation of church and state.” Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of “blue laws” is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person’s practice of their religion.

The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message.  The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.

Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.

The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual’s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with first amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.

The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.

 

Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary

The amendment to the U.S. Constitution that guarantees freedom of religion, freedom of expression (including speech, press, assembly, association, and belief), and freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.

~~~~~~

And to the First Amendment, goes the Fourth Amendment, which I came up against recently:

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

~~~~~~~

 

 

Expanding VAWA to protect Native Women

Turtle Talk has this blog up on a petition to expand Violence Against Women Act to protect Native American women.

Video here:

 

Here’s an article with more details on what is going on.  Be forewarned–the links to other instances of rape and people condoning it (Australia)–even participating in it (California) are tough to read. The 15-year-old gal that was raped barely escaped being murdered, if she was so brutalized that she was unconscious.  Makes me sick to my stomach.  What can possibly be going on in someone’s brain to make them treat another human being like that??

Libya, et al…

Well, now, common sense hasn’t left Washington, after all….

…of course Romney is gung-ho on getting us into yet another war–his five boys aren’t going to bleed for the country…

This up on the idiots behind the film that set off the violence…

Financial crimes. Check.

Pose as someone else. Check.

Claim to be a Jew when you’re a Christian. Check.

Sounds like a stand-up sort of guy. /snark

And let’s not ignore that Steve Klein is what appears to be a religious right activist who is training militias in churches…stunning, just stunning…

 

Attack on embassy in Libya

Report here. Stevens was apparently trying to find a safer place when he and his staff were killed.  And for what?  He didn’t produce the offensive video, so why target him?  Or why target anyone?  If your spirituality is strong, you’re not going to let something like this make you insane. And the Islamic religion also has  “do unto others as you would have done to you” in their book, as well, so by this act, they are going against their religion.

And what about the idiot who produced this hate-film?  Terry Jones was advocating burning the Koran, and is behind promoting this—so why isn’t this guy being reined in?  And who is the Israeli-American property developer?  I’m suspicious that he wasn’t named in the piece.

DN! reports on the Libyan situation.

They are also reporting that President Obama has refused to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.  Gah, the guy has a pair, after all. Color me shocked.  Israel has made the statement that they are free to do as they wish–to attack Iran if the mood strikes them, and the U.S. is not supposed to have any say in the matter, but we’re supposed to come running and bail them out if they do attack–extending our people, our funding, our equipment, etc. when the country is struggling. (Well, not the 1%, mind you)

So…anyone wanna place  a wager on us getting into another senseless war…?

 

9.11.01

I think this is one of those moments like “where were you when Kennedy was shot?”

I can see clearly in my mind where I was when I first learned that the towers were falling–

My youngest was home sick that day and I was playing on the internet while she watched TV (same room). (I still had a house -what a concept.)  I actually found out what was happening by the posts of a blog I was on–some of the members were in New York City, and they posted heart-wrenching posts.

I told my daughter to turn it to the news station, and watched in disbelief as the second tower was hit.  I’m still unclear on whether I was actually watching it being hit or whether I was a few minutes late–the time was about the same as the tower was hit.

I’ll never forget the utter terror of people running away from the mayhem.  Or seeing people jumping from the buildings.  Or the stories of those who saved others at their own peril.

God Bless us everyone.

(I’ll save the political commentary for another time.)

Entertainment?

You know, sometimes it ain’t so bad being without cable

I had no idea this kind of garbage was on NBC.  And look at the cast–Todd Palin…why does that not surprise me?

…um, do people know that GE, a defense contractor, owns NBC?  Do they think that just maybe this is a way to *glam up* war so more folks will blindly go into combat not knowing how horrific and soul-destroying it is…?  Or how the viewers watching it will become more numb to human suffering?

What about Mark Burnett, the producer of “Survivor”…which I always detested for its pitting people against one another, and encouraging a “weakest link” mentality…I often said that I grew up on “Gilligan’s Island”, where everyone worked together– while my kids were exposed to crap like “Survivor”, where people worked against one another for their own selfish reasons.  This encourages that  mentality of fear and violence and discourages cooperation and charity.

Good God.