I’m not a big football fan, but have caught the controversy surrounding Richard Sherman and his opponent, Michael Crabtree.
I think the whole thing has been blown waaaay out of proportion. Sherman wasn’t threatening Crabtree with physical violence. Should he have toned it down a bit? Yes, in my opinion. But it’s not on the level of being a thug, as some have referred to him.
Ed Schultz was talking about it, and Sherman has questioned whether “thug” is the new word for the n-word. I don’t know, but I don’t think so.
I do find it interesting that the media, which framed this message in a way that almost guaranteed Sherman would be flamed for what happened. The video is cut off to *just* Sherman’s rant….instead of showing the entire context with Crabtree pushing Sherman away after Sherman offered to shake hands. That is why Sherman went off. Again, it wasn’t the wisest thing, but yeah, not a crime, either.
~~As a side note, MSNBC, via Ed Schultz, is once again trying to push Hillary Clinton for president with yet another talking head declaring that “everybody” wants Clinton for candidate. Bullshit.
I find it ironic that Ed is blasting the new super secret trade agreement, TPP, while promoting Hillary Clinton for president. She is in the back pocket of Wall Street, and Big Oil, and the war profiteers. Her husband signed NAFTA into law which drove our economy into the toilet…and here Schultz was promoting her. Unreal.
You must be logged in to post a comment.