“…spraying Agent Orange on our food….” A pretty stunning statement…glad to see Melissa Harris-Perry allowing him to speak out.
Green Pasture has this up on Dr. Huber’s speech on glyphosate. (Purdue is pooh-poohing his assertions. I found a web page from Purdue that says that Dr. Huber was exaggerating the implications. Um-hmmm….a Purdue scientist with many, many years of experience is now suddenly incompetent? I don’t think so. There might be some reasons $$$ why…Purdue and other universities speak against Dr. Huber.)
From the article:
Huber spoke about a range of key factors involved in plant growth, including sunlight, water, temperature, genetics, and nutrients taken up from the soil. “Any change in any of these factors impacts all the factors,” he said. “No one element acts alone, but all are part of a system…When you change one thing,” he said, “everything else in the web of life changes in relationship.”
~~~~~~~~~~
Word.
Anybody who has grown a garden can attest to all the factors named above that impact your garden’s productiveness. Like I said, it truly is a miracle how a plant can grow from a tiny seed. The wonder of it all never ceases to amaze me. And it also never ceases to amaze me how scientists feel they know better than nature.
As Dr. Huber asserts–if a plant is in a weakened state, it will not be able to fight off disease (or pests). Everybody thinks that you *have to* spray bug killer and you *have to* use fertilizers to have a healthy plant, when it is a healthy soil (through composting) that creates the healthy plant and subsequently, the ability to fight off disease and pests.
More:
Huber reported on what he described as a newly discovered pathogen. While the pathogen is not new to the environment, Huber said, it is new to science. This pathogen apparently increases in soil treated with glyphosate, he said, and is then taken up by plants, later transmitted to animals via their feed, and onward to human beings by the plants and meat they consume.
[…]
He said laboratory tests have confirmed the presence of the organism in pigs, cattle and other livestock fed these crops, and that they have experienced sterility, spontaneous abortions, and infertility.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Pretty sobering, eh?
Here’s the Rodale report on organic versus conventional farms. This is one of the best reports I’ve ever seen. I used this report back in 1999 (?) to counteract a Hudson Institute toadie’s assertion that organic farms did much worse than conventional—if I recall correctly, it was Dennis Avery who made the assertion.
He actually said in the article that he read in Organic Gardening that they had problems with low yields and bugs. I happened to subscribe to it at the time, and there was no such thing in that article! It reported the opposite: that yields were good, and only a few plants were affected by bugs….and the best part was that with composting, the organic fields were able to retain moisture much better than the conventional soil, therefore, the organic field’s plants weathered a drought better than the conventional field.
You must be logged in to post a comment.