In Russia, the will of the state is expressed with signals of varying subtlety; the invocation of “national traitors” is among the less oblique examples of the genre. A new Web site called predatel.net—the word means “traitor”—has recently launched, featuring a list of public figures that the site’s anonymous creators deem to have betrayed Russia, whether by criticizing the annexation of Crimea or by supporting Western sanctions. As the site’s short manifesto puts it, “We believe that Russian citizens who insult our soldiers and who cast doubt on the need to fight neo-Nazis are traitors, no matter whether they are talented journalists, writers, and directors.” The site has a form for users to “suggest a traitor.”
~~~~~~~
Holy crap. The Salem Witch Hunt on steroids. Label someone a “witch” on the internet, where the accused has little access to protest their innocence…or put forth a differing point of view without being labeled a “traitor”…pfft. Cowards.
Weak arguments attack the person (Ad Hominem). Strong arguments attack the idea.
I found a news piece on Alexi Navalny’s sentencing hearing:
Finally, the link to Irina Kalinina has this:
Dmitry Kiselyov, probably the single most influential person in the Russian mass media, considered by many as the Kremlin’s chief propagandist, provides another distinctive voice on Russian television. He is best known in the West for his idea that the internal organs of gays were not fit for donation and, more recently, for his reminder that Russia could turn America into “radioactive ash.”
~~~~~~~~~
…and he calls the Ukraine people’s fight to keep their independence, a “mass psychosis”. Seriously.
(hat tip Diane Ravitch) The Dish posted this awesome video of a musical flash mob in Ukraine–the equivalent of our First Amendment (Freedom of Assembly) in action.
There’s just something about the defiance with music from the soul…brought tears to my eyes. If you recall, “Ode to Joy” was the only classical song my poor mother could get me to play, and until just recently, I could not play it, due to the mercury.
You would think that Rahm Emanuel would think twice before messing with Karen Lewis, but he apparently hasn’t been, um…schooled. (sorry, bad pun I know)
She once again delivers a smackdown of the mayor by calling him on the divide-and-conquer politics.
Be sure to click on the links to Fred Klonsky’s blog, which also gives some insight to what is going on in Chicago. What goes on there, is most certainly going on around the country. Bless Karen Lewis.
I just watched one of the most interesting Nature shows to date. And no animal violence, go figure! /just a little snarky
The program was on plants and their ability to communicate with one another.
It started with showing a plant that could not produce its own food, so it was basically a vampire plant that sucked the life out of other plants. It seemed to prefer certain plants over others–the tomato being one of them. The scientists performed an experiment where they placed the vampire plant in the middle, with the tomato plant on one side, and another plant placed on the other side.
Using time-lapse photography, they showed the vampire plant doing this little whirling dance around and around until it finally latched onto the tomato plant. It did this 9 times out of 10. So, it basically chose the tomato plant. Isn’t that interesting?
Then they went on to another plant in the west that was making a nuisance of itself. The name escapes me, but it has destroyed native grasses that the cattle farmers rely on to feed the cattle. The scientists were trying to find out why this particular plant was able to thrive. The rancher pulled up a plant by its roots, and showed a small worm/larvae just going to town on the roots…and yet the plant was still thriving. So there had to be another reason the plant was able to fend for itself. They discovered that it was sending out chemicals via its roots that killed off other competitor plants’ roots. Isn’t that amazing?
They also said they knew that plants sent off scents, but they discovered that they also send off warning scents, or what amounts to a “scream” by the plant when they are being attacked. They illustrated this by stating that the smell associated with freshly mowed grass is the grass “screaming” from being attacked. The theory is that the plants are trying to warn the other plants that they are being attacked. The other plants in the area beef up their defense mechanisms. Wow.
Finally, they wondered about “mother” trees aiding her “babies”. The theory wasn’t new, they said, but they hadn’t been able to prove it. So, a research team injected radioactive carbon into a douglas fir and then went back after a time with a geiger counter to see where the carbon ended up. They found the most concentrated amount in baby firs nearby. They also found it in carbon “trails” to other firs in the area that belonged to the same plant family. I had one issue, though, with this–and this may have been done, but the program didn’t show it–they didn’t run the geiger counter on the ground or around the trees before injecting the fir with the radioactive material. This, to me, would have been a “control” to make sure that the radioactivity wasn’t already there from, God forbid, Fukushima or some other source.
So…all of this is not news to the Native Americans, whom have always believed that plants had a “life”. Everything is connected–plants, too.
Yeah, we’re slow as always in catching up to the wisdom. But at least we’re getting there. 🙂
Pando Daily has this up on a technology that takes pictures for advertising numbers…but has much deeper violations of privacy.
It is presented as being innocent…but we all know by now it doesn’t end up that way.
This is outrageous. Plain and simple violation of a person’s right to move about in public without being subjected to an intrusion such as being photographed.
There are so many holes in this guy’s theory it could be Swiss cheese.
For one–just because a person looks at an advertisement does not mean they will purchase that product or service. For instance, I may look at an advertisement on a professional bug killer service, but there is no way that I’m calling that service. The advertisers use bright colors, flashing words or lights, and the usual “grabs” of sex, fear, anger, and love. All of these factors may draw the human eye towards the advertising, but not mean the person will buy it.
It never ceases to amaze me how psychology is used to interpret a person’s thoughts by outward gestures or appearances, when that psychological conclusion is dead wrong.
I went online looking for Rodolfo Saccoman and found this disturbing video:
It is alarming that they are using “feel good” emotions to justify the psychology software program. They’re there to “help” with an impersonal, flawed science (in that psychology has sprouted from misogyny and bullying mindset). Saccoman states that this software will “help” those suffering from PTSD from committing suicide…but methinks that instead it will be used to either label someone as mentally ill who might be having a rough day and just need someone to talk to–not a freaking impersonal computer. Or it will be used as a tool by Big Pharma to force someone to take unproven and unsafe psychotropic drugs. I feel it in my gut that this is what is driving this “help”. I’d like to know if his brother is invested in Big Pharma…it’s not such a big leap when you consider that Saccoman mentions he loves the stocks and even built this software on that model. If they could get more poor souls buying Big Pharma drugs, well, that’s just more money for them.
And then as the video keeps rolling, we get to the *bingo!* moment…when he says he worked for Morgan Stanley. An investment banker who thinks greed is good and screw the public. He claims to hate it, but then goes on to say that he made money…so he couldn’t have hated it too much.
He looks at billboards and says they don’t have any intelligence. You don’t know if anyone is reading them. Really? Because I can think of several instances where folks have become upset at messages on billboards…so obviously people are paying attention to them.
Privacy never comes out of his mouth when speaking about how great this is and how money is being *lost* by not seizing the opportunity for yet more advertising dollars.
He attended a Tony Robbins show, er I mean, inspirational speech, where he claims they “tear you apart, then put you back together” Sounds like psychological abuse to me.
Then he shows commercials for getting people to sign up for this. Note that the target audience is the young, who don’t have the experience to understand how this violates privacy and the ramifications of that. The ignorance of the youth on their right to privacy is appalling.
They have concerns about paying for college (understandable), so this is marketed to them as being a way to pay for college. The subtle play on emotions with their “love story” also reels people in. They also use the “everybody” is doing it schtick with the line “all our awesome friends are also doing it.” Again, invading someone’s privacy and their part in it is never mentioned.
Saccoman repeatedly portrays standard advertising as “old school” dinosaurs. This is another tactic used very successfully by the marketing gurus–nobody wants to be “left behind” so they will buy the latest to be seen as keeping up with the world. This tactic really took hold in the 70s when there was plenty of money in the middle class to buy the “latest”. Thank God I have broken myself of that brainwashing.
Another aspect to this way of advertising is driving around to get the “face” quota. Using gas, spewing fumes into the air, creating more crowded roadways, and possibly causing accidents by distracting people from watching the road and the vehicles around them. Just yesterday, I saw three people talking on cell phones on Indy’s busiest roadways…and they were driving in ways that showed they were distracted and not paying attention to their own driving or those around them.
Again, the emotional tug is used when the fake “son” talks about how his fake “Mom” inspired him. It has nothing to do with the software or the advertising, but is snuck in there to give one the “warm and fuzzy’ feelings.
And the one thing I don’t see when looking at Saccoman’s actual backpack? A sign in big bold letters saying “YOUR FACE IS BEING COLLECTED FOR ADVERTISING PURPOSES” on the backpack.
Near the end, he makes an odd statement to “push” for what you want…but then he gets philosophical and says if it flows, it flows…so which is it? Does one push or just let things “flow”?
Lastly, he admires Steve Jobs and Apple. Given their illegal wage-fixing, and this response by Jobs over getting someone fired, well, it kind of speaks of character…why would one admire someone so contemptible?
DN! has a piece up today on a documentary entitled “Dear White People…”
We need the conversation to begin, so I’m glad that they are taking it on…but as I viewed the excerpts, I started to get that feeling of dread. Because a young African American woman states that we (black folks) are all different and another clip one states that because she is the person of color in the room, suddenly she becomes the “voice” of the African American community. But it seems lost on the black community that perhaps whites feel the same way? We don’t all think alike and because one treats you badly or is prejudiced does not mean that we all agree with that person’s actions. Most white folks have good hearts but don’t realize some of the stuff that is said and done is hurtful (as the producer of the documentary states.)
During the interview with “Reggie” –he talks about his personal life and how he lived on an all-black floor in college. He said it helped to be with his “people’ after having people touch his hair and professors say “stuff” to him….my thought was: doesn’t he think some white people could understand that? Again, it is a block put up to sharing a common bond. White people whom have been bullied, put down, ostracized can all understand how being singled out feels. They may not understand how it is to be black, but they can understand pain.
And the tipping thing? Hello! Women are also stereotyped for being bad tippers. A long time ago, when I had a life, I sat in a restaurant and waited while the white waitresses were gossiping for twenty minutes until one finally came over to take my order. And it was cold when she brought it out. And yeah, I left a penny tip. Screw that.
In other instances, I would leave 15% tips when the going rate was 10%. Sometimes the service warranted that, but most times it was just okay, but I left the bigger tip because of the prejudice against women.
As far as his admission that black folk use their blackness as a tool sometimes to navigate the world…but it creates barriers. As I experienced in Ft. Wayne, an African American guy had created a serious problem for the entire building that could have meant injury or death for the residents. When one of the white fire fighters said something to him because he was yelling at them to shut the alarm off (they could not do that–it was a door alarm and they had the door open to let all the smoke out)** edited, he immediately blamed it on racism. He went on and on about it instead of taking a step back and realizing HE was the problem, not his skin color. And this is not a condemnation of the guy–he wasn’t a bad person, but had a screwed up view of the world.
It’s funny that this came up today, because when I was getting dressed this morning, I thought about seeing the Light in others.
Buddhists popped into my head –the Buddhists don’t believe in a God as one Supreme Being, but that God resides in each of us. Their greeting “Namaste” means that they recognize God within you and within themselves.
Even if one doesn’t believe in the Buddhist religion, if we could stop looking at each other’s skin color…or anything physical…and recognize the Light within the other, we could move past the prejudice. Our hearts involved in decision making instead of just our heads…
**edited for link to DN and further explanation above.
How in the world does one collide with a barge? It’s not like they’re speed boats zipping past one…
…looks like another drunken captain.
The words George Bush I echo the oil man’s empty promises of safety…and clean up…as we have witnessed with every freaking oil spill since then–Kalamazoo and Arkansas and the Gulf are evidence of that. As one of the commenters said, the captain was made the scapegoat while the company escaped blame.
And Tricky Dicks’ comments? “The Alaskan pipeline is on the way…and the environment will be saved…” Priceless.
The proponents of XL pipeline are saying it’s going to create jobs…but as this video illustrates, how many jobs are lost (income lost) by the spills? How does one put a price tag on the oiled soil, water, and dead/impaired wildlife? Why are they even *considering* XL after all that has happened…?
Global News has obtained video of the Russian gate crashers at the Ukraine air base in Crimea. The report states they are not sure if they are Russian military or pro-Russia militia in Ukraine.
It’s hard to see the layout, but it does look rather open. I would think with the situation, there would have been more armored vehicles to prevent such an attack. It just looks like they “walked” up to the door and let themselves in.
The second question I thought was why have they not begun to pull back once Crimea voted to join Russia? Are there more people in Crimea wanting them to stay and we aren’t being told this by the lame media? Because if the gate crashers are pro-Russia militia…with obvious military capabilities…that are intimidating the peaceful ones of Crimea…then Houston, we have a problem.
You know, if I didn’t know better, I would think this was written in the 1950s, by conservative busybodies with too much time on their hands. Talk about cutting out the young people! Keep in mind that the whole system of chiefs was forced upon the indigenous…so the concept is really against their tradition.
“It’s the end of us… we’re not going to vote,” one man said. “Eighty per cent of this community is under 40 and us, the young people, we need some attention. We need public attention, media attention. This is discrimination.”
~~~~~~~~
More here from Warrior Publications on Kinder Morgan taking what it wants whether a landowner wants to cede ownership or not.
A home is your castle…until Big Oil wants a piece of that castle…
Eagle 
You must be logged in to post a comment.