Category Archives: big oil
No Justice for Bhopal
Incredibly, the citizens of Bhopal, India, are still left holding the bag after Union Carbide’s tragic 1984 accident that killed 20,000 people and polluted unknown amounts of water, soil and air.
In the environmental book I’m reading, they recount the Love Canal disaster and all the complexities involved in resolving a toxic event. The original company, Hooker Chemical, sold the land to the local school board, and incredibly, the school board took it with a contract that stipulated that Hooker Chemical was not responsible for any chemicals on the land. They had been dumping chemicals there for years—and they built a school on top of the land. Parents began complaining about their children’s health issues within five years after the schools’ opening.
This is where it gets interesting–they were ignored, and when they were finally believed, at first the reaction is what you would expect by those in charge–they admitted there was a problem, and came up with solutions for it. However, once the financial numbers were crunched, they decided there wasn’t a problem, after all. Even the state’s health dept scientists were loathe to charge the state for the clean-up.
And the ones who did the toxic dumping–the chemical company–walked away. This is the real problem–chemical companies, pharmaceutical companies, oil companies that screw up and just walk away because it’s more important to keep them in business than it is to hold them accountable.
California Legislature acts against Citizens United
I’m of the I’ll-believe-it-when-I-see-it camp...too many times I’ve gotten my hopes up (Wisconsin being the latest) where Democracy was in action, but the voices went unheard….
DN! today
DN has this up today.
Let’s only hope that the carbon emissions news is followed by actual, you know, action. Because if anything this administration is famous for–it’s tough words with no backbone. The other day, I was listening to Limbaugh rant about the immigration law and Arizona and how the Obama Administration was instituting an “800” number for anyone observing a police officer violating someone’s civil rights. Limbaugh was all for civil rights and said it was about time that they started doing something about it.
bwahahaahahahahahaha. *snort*
Um, okay, he really didn’t say that. He was incensed that the Obama administration was actually trying to provide a way for folks to speak up. He immediately said it would be the sniveling liberals who would be calling in and the police officers would be afraid of lawsuits, yada, yada, yada.
My heart was lifted at the news of an “800” number…but then I recalled all the past “strong” words by this administration, followed by…no action. So, yeah, unless there is a full time staff behind this 800 number, and the people at the other end of the phone are actually empowered to DO something, well, I don’t see it providing much help. And it might even hurt someone who calls in thinking they are doing a service for the community, give their name, phone number and they themselves are harassed. I’m just saying this is a possibility. An administration that allows illegal wire-tapping against the Fourth Amendment leaves me doubting the sincerity of this program. Why now? Especially after record deportations?
Onto the other stories on DN:
The Tar Sands pipeline being once again pushed by Big Oil and the Obama Administration going along is another red flag that this administration continues to say one thing and do another. I’m just cynical enough to wonder if the sudden decrease in gas prices has anything to do with the Administration’s agreeing to Tar Sands?
Lawmakers making money off of legislation? No way. They’re the most fine, upstanding individuals ever to walk the Earth. /snark
You see, entitlement only applies to little old ladies trying to collect Social Security and the poor trying to collect food stamps to eat. They make the laws, so members of Congress are entitled to make profits off of it.
Sorry to see Nora Ephron has passed. I was watching “When Harry Met Sally…” last night. Peace to her.
The 99 percent of us…
commondreams has this up.
Pretty much says it all…
The pain of Bain
…and playing the game…
Yeah, it’s not really news, either.
I can’t figure out why all that money that was raised at Clooney’s party couldn’t have been better placed behind a third party candidate? Harry Braun, anyone? Yeah, I don’t think he’s perfect, but it is so refreshing to see an intelligent discussion of the serious issues facing us right now. And not part of the financial/big oil crowd….
~~~~~~~~
Related to this, is this incident with Romney and John Lauber. I’d heard about this, but couldn’t get to it until now. Wow. The rightwing host here was having a fit over the publishing of this story–he was saying that this was old news and that the Post was in a conspiracy because it was published the same day that Obama came out for gay marriage. As if…
The rightwing host went on to say that “this was 1965–nobody wore their hair long then. Nobody.” Um, yeah, I have a different recollection. Even though I was only 4 years old at the time, I remember how irate my father was at the “long hairs” and “weirdos”. So guys were starting to wear their hair long–it just wasn’t acceptable by the anal retentives. To express your individuality with long hair was verboten–as Herr Romney illustrated.
Anyway, the rightwing host failed to recognize the bullying aspect and how wrong this was. Romney had no right to impose his will on another. None. He was violent towards another individual. I think that is very relevant to his character and whether we want such a person leading this country.
Let’s see…contempt of the poor, bragging about paying 13% of a normal 35% in taxes, wants to destroy public schools,…and now bullying…sounds like a stand up kinda guy. /snark
Protected: Getting bolder
Afghan killings, the poor, bankers, etc.
Common dreams has this link up on yet another killing of innocent Afghanis’ who were minding their own business. Meanwhile, support for the war from the people who are paying for it, is at a new low. Where’s my representation, again…?
~~~~~~~~~~
Meanwhile, the repubs continue their “Eat Shit” campaign against the poor, elderly, and disabled in this country…because, you know, we have to be over in Afghanistan or whatever country has our oil in it, and we can’t be bothered with either creating jobs or feeding people if there are no decent paying jobs available so they can feed themselves….
The comments section brings up the involuntary servitude of the Prisons for Fun and Profit scheme.
The most telling paragraph is this one in the Reuters clip:
The Ryan bill also takes aim at financial reforms, eliminating the government’s powers to shut down large financial institutions, as well as cutting funding for the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. A tort reform plan to end frivolous lawsuits included in the measure would lead to lower health care costs, according the CBO.
There is the heart of this, folks. I’m reading The Indebted Society by James Medoff and Andrew Harless in which they assert that the economy of this country has been manipulated by the bankers/financial institutions for their own benefit. Bankers need low wages so that people will borrow. The book stated that wages have remained stagnant (which we already knew) and that people were borrowing just to maintain their lifestyles as far back as the eighties. However, those things they were borrowing money for–luxury items–were not necessary for life and if they had to let them go back to the bank for lack of payment it wasn’t a big hardship. However, with this current economic situation, the borrowing was not for luxury items, but just to survive–they refinanced their homes, or borrowed on credit cards to buy groceries and needed items…that sort of thing. And that is why we saw so many folks “hit the wall”. Their wages were no longer able to meet the very basics of life.
Medoff and Harless are blaming the Federal Reserve for not wanting inflation to rise–bankers don’t like inflation because it hurts their bottom line. And they heavily influence the Fed, as much as the Fed would like to deny it. Medoff and Harless say that there has been too much emphasis on consumption, and not enough on investment.
~~~~~~~~~~
And, just to shed light on the media campaign by the sociopaths–I was flipping through the radio the other night, and there was Sean Hannity.
Hannity actually made the claim that “socialist spending has gotten us into this economy.” Say whaaat? No, it’s not taxing the top 1% at a fair tax rate, and even reducing their taxes while starting not one, not two, but three military conflicts and/or wars, it’s feeding the poor and the elderly! God these people drive me crazy.
Oh, and they’re quick to bring God into the conversation to justify their un-Jesus-like selfishness:
Overheard on a rightwing station here in FW (they’re pretty much all rightwing, just some to a lesser degree)–
“Be obedient to God–get out and vote. Be obedient to God–politically you’re either conservative or liberal. You have to decide which way is obedient to God. ”
Yeah, so wouldn’t following “Thou Shalt Not Kill” and “Thou Shalt Not Covet thy neighbors’ stuff” (this includes oil, folks) be obedient to God? How about “Do unto others as you would have done unto you?”
Free (Hidden) Speech
Protestors against the pipeline were hidden out of view while supporters of the pipeline were given a prime location to vocalize.
When asked about this inequity, the police said, “they were probably on private property and have been given permission to be there by the property owner.” That private property was a public sidewalk, and we all know who really owns the sidewalks at the “pipeline crossroads of the world.”
There’s a note in the comments that this story originated on the 350.org website (scroll down), but there’s no mention of that on common dreams. Hmm…getting a little sloppy there, folks…