Really, the repub party should go from the “party of NO’ to the “party of whine”. Good God, can they play the victim…
They were seeking approval to operate under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. This would require them to be “social welfare,” not political, operations. There are significant advantages to being a 501(c)(4). These groups don’t pay taxes; they don’t have to disclose their donors—unlike traditional political organizations, such as political-action committees. In return for the tax advantage and the secrecy, the 501(c)(4) organizations must refrain from traditional partisan political activity, like endorsing candidates.
~~~~~~~~~~
Since when is asking questions “singling-out” someone? Asking questions is the IRS’s job. And the last line of the above quote is enough to revoke their tax exempt status.
George Will is trying to compare this to Watergate. Seriously?? How lame.
If Republicans had controlled both houses of Congress in 1973, Nixon would have completed his term. If Democrats controlled both today, the Obama administration’s lawlessness would go uninvestigated.
~~~~~~~~
Committee members of Watergate- Senate: three repubs on it.
A brief on the Watergate affair.
On CSPAN this morning, they had Jenny Martin, the CEO of Tea Party Patriots. She was playing the victim well–without really offering any hard evidence of the accusations of the IRS…even when asked for specifics by a caller. I listened carefully to her mini-speeches, and once when she began to divulge what actually occurred, she caught herself and went back to “safe mode” without giving the details. Hmmm….
Meanwhile, when the point was made that the IRS has been inundated by groups applying for tax exempt status, so there was possibly a backlog AND good reason to scrutinize these groups that don’t want to pay taxes. (The irony here is that the Tea Party is all about reducing government workers, but it would appear that the backlog is created because of a lack of skilled workers to process them…)
It is clear that Tea Party Patriots is a political group and they promote their political causes aggressively…so why shouldn’t the IRS ask them pointed questions about their fundraising and their activities?? If you want to avoid taxes, you’d better be prepared to answer some questions.
(Gah, I never in a million years thought I’d be sticking up for the IRS. Lord knows they’ve used their strong arm tactics on me–when I lost my house, they actually wanted to charge me for taking a profit(!!) and then when I owed a measily $200 (and didn’t have the money to pay them) they threatened to take what was left after the crash and burn. I did eventually pay it off in installments. but it was difficult at that point in time. )
Eagle 
You must be logged in to post a comment.