Memory hole blog has this up on the chilling of free speech and the ability of any American, including academics, to voice their thoughts and question authority.

If you follow the link to the Chronicle of Higher Education…you can see how the author twists the piece to appear to be in favor of free speech…but not so fast.

The author, Kevin Carey, blasts those that question Sandy Hook Hoax and 9/11 as they are presented by authority…but insists he is for free speech.

WTH?

Americans are guaranteed the right to free speech by the First Amendment.  This means you can stand on the street corner stating the sky is purple.  People won’t believe you, but you have the right to say it.

In that vein of thought, someone has the right to say that they don’t believe the official stories of Sandy Hook nor of 9/11.  The person hearing it also has the right not to believe them.

That is what democracy is all about.  A free exchange of ideas so that we can A) keep politicians in check; and B) come to a better understanding and hopefully a better democracy through others’ different ideas.  In other words, growth.

Be sure to click on the link to the curious case of Noah Pozner, reportedly died at Sandy Hook, is being claimed as a victim in Pakistan, as well.  Hmmm…how does one die twice — in two different countries…?

Additionally, Lenny Pozner, the supposedly grieving father of Noah, has the HONR network that is harassing anyone who questions Sandy Hoax.  He and his toadies are getting people’s phone numbers, contacting their employers, and other harassing/stalking behavior to silence them.  Why?  What are he and his stalking comrades so afraid of?   That the public will find out that there was no Noah Pozner, and they gave money to this fraud? That his arse could land in jail for perpetuating a fraud for monetary gain?

Lenny Pozner could have easily proven that he had the rights if this were true. Lenny has certainly displayed a competency (or incompetency) regarding DMCA complaints. He has filed THOUSANDS of copyright complaints on YouTube against anyone investigating Sandy Hook. Most are overturned, but not until the video is first removed and a counterclaim is filed

Why else would someone who is supposed to be grieving go to the lengths that Pozner has gone?  Note that Lenny Pozner is not his real name….which REALLY makes one wonder who or what is behind this–especially when a rabbi is getting in on it.  Israel pops up once again.  Not saying for certain it is responsible, but yet another connection to Israel, like the dancing Israelis on 9/11.

Pozner accomplishes a great deal with getting the video removed –those viewing it and perhaps linking to it will have a dead link and believe the video has been removed, instead of searching for it again under a different link (once it has been cleared of DMCA infringement).

Many people don’t want to file a counterclaim because in order to do so, one must provide their actual name and address, which opens you up to further stalking and harassment from Lenny and his clan.

Bingo.  Mission accomplished.  Creep. Not only a creep, but allegedly a criminal liar, as well.

In the comments,  Tracy has posted a comment by Jim Fetzer:

[…]

This was a two-day FEMA drill, with the rehearsal on the 13th, going LIVE on the 14th. Some participants became confused and put up donation sites on-line for an event that had yet to occur. Adam Lanza’s death was initially recorded in the Social Security Death Index as having taken place on the 13th, which makes his accomplishment in shooting 20 kids and 6 adults the following day all the more remarkable. We even have the FEMA manual, which I made the Appendix A.

The book was too hot for the Obama administration and was banned less than a month after publication–it had already sold nearly 500 copies–by amazon.com, where Jay Carney became Senior Vice President when he left the White House. I suspect one of the reasons is that I included another appendix demonstrating that, when guns are banned, crime goes up. Does anyone seriously believe that criminals are going to be intimidated by citizens who have been disarmed? Far from “an epidemic of gun violence”, it has been dropping steadily since 1993.

There are thirteen contributors to the book, including six Ph.D. (current or retired) professors. Among the others is Paul Preston, an LA area Superintendent of Schools, who was so troubled by what he observed being broadcast from Sandy Hook that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, each of whom confirmed that it had been a drill, that no one had died and that it had been done to promote gun control. When it was banned, I released it to the public as a pdf for free. 

[…]

Jim Fetzer has more on Sandy Hoax on his blogspot page here.

Here’s a pretty good article on the toxic environmental causes of man boobs.  I rather doubt that a calcified physician is going to tell his/her male patients that the very drugs the doc is giving them will cause this (or if they do, they will likely dismiss this side effect as being *necessary* so that the drug can *fix* the patient.  Pfft.

Neither will the calcified medical professional tell his/her patient that environmental toxins from their cookware to detergents are also causing moobs.

They’d much rather make some more moula doing surgery or having the patient return for umpteen medical appointments to *get to the reason* for the gynecomastia.   Or worse, the physician has invested in the stock of the pharma drug he/she is prescribing for the gynecomastia.

And I’m willing to bet that somewhere along the line, the calcified professional will hint that the man has some psychological issue resulting in the growth of breasts.  I can’t say that I have actual knowledge of this…just a hunch.  And if so, I would not be surprised to learn the physician has invested in psych drugs.

Seriously, I think every patient needs to not only do their own homework before ever entering a physician’s office, but come with a warrior attitude and ask questions of how much  a doc has invested in pharmaceuticals or how much they know of environmental toxins.  The answers will tell you what you need to know about the physician’s true interests — is it in making bucks and going along with Big Pharma; or is it a true healing physician?

And ladies, don’t think that this only applies to men.  Everything that affects hormones affects both sexes in different…but significant ways.

Be well, my friends.

 

 

So, there’s a town with an emblem that looks to some of us as an aggressive action of a white guy towards a Native American.  They say in this article that it’s not what it appears, yada, yada, yada.

When I was viewing it this morning, I wondered if people would be so complacent if it were a black man?  Given the history of aggression towards the Native Americans, it comes across as a symbol of victory for the White Europeans.  Just my take.

I asked a young Native American if it bothered her.  She said it didn’t bother her as much as the commercialization of Native Americans.  She specifically mentioned the dreamcatchers now available in WalFart and Penneys, and so forth.  She feels that her culture is being taken away from them.  That it is disappearing.  I agree.

Commercialization is all about making a profit.  It is not about spirituality.  It diminishes the significance of the culture.  It is a subtle reduction of powerful connectedness.

 

I’m sorry, but I can’t help but draw parallels to this report of holistic/naturopath doctors who were unknowingly given a hallucinogenic drug without their knowledge….and MKUltra, a CIA program that gave LSD and other hallucinogens to unsuspecting people, then observed them behind double mirrors.  But it’s all good, because it was done in the name of science and trying to counteract bioweapons….um-hmmm.

I swear that I did not know of this when I posted on MK Ultra. All of these deaths, including Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet (still no answers yet), came about at the same time.  I don’t care if I’m called a conspiracy theorist…especially now that we know it was a CIA creation to make those of us who ask questions and don’t settle for pat answers out to be idiots or tinfoil hat wearers…

…and it bothers me that people like Erin Elizabeth feel the need to state “I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but…”

I’m a conspiracy theorist when I see things start to connect.

That doesn’t make me a tinfoil hat wearer, but an observant, intelligent person who thinks independently.

 

Here’s a report that states there is STILL OIL in Kalamazoo River, FIVE YEARS after the spill.  Not only that, but the Great Lakes area has become a magnet for Big Energy.  Indiana, for one, doesn’t give a rat’s behind about the environment.  They have actually appointed an energy industry insider to the Indiana Department of Envronmental Mis-Management (IDEM)…and the governor’s brother.  What a joke.  They must have been guffawing behind closed doors at that one.

(And once again, I am shocked, shocked, at a reporter actually practicing journalism.)

 

The problem with this story is this sentence:

Since then, cleanup crews have returned to his property about eight times and recovered about 50 pounds of the material.

The reader is lulled into believing that the waste has been taken away and the fear of nuclear waste is…gone.  Tra-la-la…

Only it isn’t.

Now it’s been moved to another area (probably a poor/minority neighborhood) to be forgotten.  Out of sight, out of mind.

We’ve been under this delusion that either we can move radioactive/hazardous material away from us, over *here* to someone else over *there* (who doesn’t have the resources to fight it.

And like the Kalamazoo spill, the people affected by it “just moved to another location”…and there was yet another oil pipeline close by.

Can we admit to ourselves that there really is no safe solution to nuclear or hazardous waste?  That we have been far too willing to believe that nonsense because it was conveeeenient?  That there are less and less spaces without contamination?