In my previous post, I related getting a ticket for going 55 mph on US 31 nearby. I was holding my phone for a couple reasons — for the camera to record who is around me because of people trying to cause accidents and because I was looking for a store that I was unfamiliar with and had mapped the location. The screen was black when the officer pulled me over.
Just to be clear, I was not talking on the phone and do not condone talking while driving. It’s dangerous.
So right after I got the ticket with a court date of October 14, rump proclaimed the date as Charlie Kirk day. I suspected something was up and expected the worse at my court date.
When I appeared in court, there was a woman judge sitting on the bench. She did not introduce herself when I sat before her. They also made me wait for an hour and a half before I was called. Because of my spinal issues, I had to stand up a few times to relieve the pressure because my legs were going numb.
Anyway, the judge asked questions about the circumstances and I said that I was holding the phone but not talking on it. I was going 55 mph in the left lane and that was the reason I was pulled over by Indiana State Police. I said there were drivers zooming past doing 70-80 mph but the police pulled me over for doing 55!
The judge made statements such as “this is the first case of holding a phone I’ve ever seen. Everybody in this courtroom has done it at some point in time. I’ve done it too.”
At that point in time, she should have ruled it as a first time offense and let me off with a warning. That is how we have always done it in Indiana. We have always been an easygoing state and if a person is not a habitual traffic offender, we let them off with a warning. After that, they are given fines accordingly.
So the judge did not let me off with a warning but allowed the prosecutor to rule by asking me if I had held the phone in my hand. I answered yes, but I was not talking on the phone. That is easily corroborated by checking the calls made and received at that time. None of that was done. The officer could not find that I was guilty of lane straying or some other reason for pulling me over. I was doing 55 mph, which is a safe speed. And it saves gas.
The fine for this first time? $165!!!
I kid you not. This is so out of line for Indiana. Not how we do things.
So the judge for my present county was NOT sitting on the bench, but an unelected woman judge.
So if you recall, the same thing happened in Cass County, Indiana, where I had sued to get my house back. Not one, but two judges who were not elected by the citizens of Cass County were sitting on the bench to rule on my case. I didn’t realize this until the second hearing in July 2023, when I specifically asked the judge if he were elected by the people of Cass County? He answered no. Because of my abilities, I had a vision of him throwing a tantrum in the judge’s chambers after the hearing. He was literally throwing things around.
So I appealed to the Indiana supreme court, and they barely let the ink dry before refusing to overrule the lower court, even with the evidence of illegal judge sitting on the bench.
This is the very basis of American law — we citizens of the county, through voting, elect who we want to serve as judges to rule on court cases. Anyone else sitting on the bench is illegal. It’s taxation without representation. This is what my ancestors fought against in the American Revolution. The King of England was taxing us but we had no say in our governing laws.
So I had read of the gold fringe around the flags in courtrooms meaning it was a court of maritime law. But others said that wasn’t the case.
Then I began looking up Jewish law. I think I’ve found my answers:
In the Bible, Old Testament:
Numbers 15:37–
The Lord said to Moses, Speak to the Israelites and say to them: Throughout the generations to come, you are to make fringe on the garments with blue cord attached to the fringe.
This is so you will remember the Commandments.”
It doesn’t specifically say gold fringe, but gold is a word frequently associated with Jewish religion. Other websites associated yellow with the Jewish religion, as well.
So if I am reading the subliminal messages correctly, the gold fringe on courtroom flags is a symbol of a court ruling by Jewish law.
Next, I looked up women and Jewish law.
From the website womenslaw.org
Legal Information: Religious
You are here
- Jewish Community
Jewish Community
What is a “get” or “sefer k’ritot?”
A get is a religious divorce under halacha (Jewish law), and can only be given by a husband to a wife. The word can also refer to the paper that officially gives a get. This is a sefer k’ritot (scroll of severance).
What is a “beit din?”
A beit din is a rabbinical court, usually consisting of three rabbis but sometimes it consists of one rabbi and two educated, nonreligious (secular) members of the community. A beit din can be held for many reasons, such as to oversee a person’s conversion to Judaism or to give a couple a get.
If a husband requests a get, the beit din meets only once, to witness the writing of the sefer k’ritot (scroll of severance) and its delivery to the wife. In this case, the beit din will not question either party but will simply oversee the process. If a wife seeks a get, the beit din must first meet to hear her case. If they decide her case is valid, they will require her husband to appear before them to give the get. However, if he refuses to appear, the beit din has no civil legal authority to force him to do so.
End quote
So, a woman can not get a divorce if her husband will not allow it .
I believe this what has been happening to me and probably others, as well.
I believe that somehow, my sister’s husband had claimed me as a “wife” even though there was no such agreement on my end. It’s just beyond bizarre!!!
And yet everything that has happened to me points to it.
Remember, her husband tried to enter my bedroom at 2 a.m. while I stayed there after my house was illegally taken from me (by Roland Arnall, a Zionist running Ameriquest, the loan sharks that foreclosed on my house.) Rape is part of the religion. Ritual murder is part of the religion.
When I tried to get a protective order against her husband because of his following me to whatever town I was in, the judge refused to grant it. When I brought up the creep unlocking my locked door and attempting to rape me, the judge said “he can do whatever he wants, it’s his house”
They have been trying to force me to marry again. I refuse to marry again. One abusive relationship was enough. I have gone without sex for thirty years and I don’t miss it!
They don’t recognize women as equals. We are subhuman to them.
But Jesus believed women were equal. He allowed Mary Magdalene to become a disciple though it was unheard of. Mary Magdalene was of the lineage of Morovian Kings, just as Jesus was, so they were both royalty. Jesus treated her as equal to the men following Him. This was a huge threat to those who used religion to punish women.
All of the above points towards a secret society of people claiming to be Jews but worshiping in the synagogue of satan, as stated in Revelation 3.
So don’t put all Jews in the same category, as I am a Jew by heritage but follower of Jesus, who believed women were equals
Eagle 